A few days ago, AML Bitcoin published a press release essentially saying that obsession with anonymity is the enemy of cryptocurrencies because it makes regulators nervous. It would be tough to call it an obsession when most early adopters got interested not because they intended to use it for criminal activity, but because they felt that it was nobody's business if they used Bitcoin to do things like pay for a gentleman's club membership. In that light, it may be unfair to pick on the "elite" in the cryptocurrency world who may have joined the community because they like privacy. However, there is still the impression that cryptocurrencies are used for things like fraud and money laundering, so I reached out to AML Bitcoin CEO Brian Darling to see if the company would be willing to clarify their position in a brief Q&A.
Q: What makes AML Bitcoin think that anonymity is the source of cryptocurrencies' current issues?
A: Anonymity is not bad per se and anonymity is an element of the AML BitCoin model. The problem is that some cryptocurrencies have not policed themselves to make it hard for the cryptocurrency users to exploit anonymity for nefarious purposes. The consumers of AML BitCoin must have their identities verified to avoid straw purchasing by individuals, including agents of rogue nations, who are banned from banking. There are several AML BitCoin security protocols in place that include having identity verified by a third party. It is very important that government is not allowed to destroy the business model of cryptocurrencies through overbearing regulations intended on exterminating a competing currency. Efforts in the United States to treat cryptocurrencies as a security or a commodity are wrong headed and would destroy all digital currencies. It is important that an alternative digital currency is introduced into the market to avoid the problems of leading cryptocurrencies with allegations of money laundering, human trafficking and drug dealing.
Q: What are some of the solutions that AML Bitcoin provide to help solve these issues?
A: AML Bitcoin uses biometric digital identity protocols, coupled with a third-party verification process, to give confidence to government that AML BitCoin is interested in self-policing and making it difficult for the digital currency to be used by bad actors. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are important actors in the market, but the new AML BitCoin merely provides some competition and the introduction of a digital currency that will be easier for government to allow into markets.
Q: How do you think cryptocurrency insiders can better communicate with regulators to ensure a regulatory environment that is friendly toward cryptocurrencies and blockchain?
A: Right now, there is a problem with many governments, including South Korea and Japan, expressing public frustration and passing new laws that inhibit the use of cryptocurrencies. The producers of blockchain technology need to better educate the world as to the nature of their competitive currency and ways in which they are combatting use by bad actors. The goal is to self-regulate in a way that both preserves anonymity while providing some assurances to government that these producers of the blockchain are making best efforts to police themselves. That has not happened to date, but the model being used by AML BitCoin provides an example of the proper way to respond to threats of government regulation.
Q: Do you foresee any type of reasonable compromise between cryptocurrency insiders who value anonymity for certain transactions and regulators that insist on KYC and AML compliance? Do you think AML Bitcoin can help with a compromise if these two parties can create one?
A: Much like hard currency, it is impossible to rid any currency from being used by bad actors, but it is possible to minimize the threat. Regulators who want anti-money laundering and know your customer compliance can be confident that AML BitCoin complies. It is clear that some governments are making reasonable claims, yet others merely want to use the pre-text of regulations to drive digital currency out of the markets. AML BitCoin can help show the way on how to lower the reasonable requests of government while exposing government regulators who merely want to exterminate a competing currency to the government approved currency of a nation.
 

$2.00
50.0¢

No one has reviewed this piece of content yet
Comments
  earned $10.00
"The problem is that this anonymity is causing governments and industry to bar digital currencies, which in turn has caused a massive collapse in value of digital currencies."
I wonder why they think anonymity is the cause of the recent dip. Not sure how they can be so confident in that assessment. More likely just an invented correlation that fits their narrative.
I briefly looked over the whitepaper. They think POS stands for proof-of-stack (lol), and say it is better than proof of work. As far as fair distribution, I was not surprised by what I found. This coin features 200 million total units with only 55 million available for a hybrid of POW & POS mining rewards (I suspect most of it will be mined via POS since they obviously hold most of the units to begin with).
If this coin gains any traction, some folks stand to become very rich from the insecurity of governments/institutions. One good thing is they may attract some of XRP's investor base.
Good luck to them in competing with privacy-centric, censorship resistant, P2P digital Bitcoin Cash! Thanks for sharing this.
$10.00
   10mo ago
$10.00
  earned 0.0¢
I don't know who AML is but that is cool they seem to have so much care about Bitcoin. I truly believe Bitcoin and many cyptocurrencies will continue to flourish and grow no matter what three letter institutions keep using scary words like "destroy" in their answers. A lot of loaded questions:
is the source of cryptocurrencies' current issues
I appreciate these questions and answers being shared here on Yours but am genuinely not concerned, but just confused, as to a lot of the content of them. AML or KYC or whoever can just fork and create their own marketplace to make rules as they wish on them, right?
0.0¢
   10mo ago