This is my half-assed response to the quarter-assed article of CSW, trying to hate on Roger and fringe anarchists. Hypocrisy:CSW
Apart from the main question of statist or anarchist order, it's undeniable, that modern laws are to vast and intricately grown through any industry to a completely unjustifiable degree. One, where individuals can be fucked over with arbitrary enforcement; A good part of overarching regulations is also the power, that such regulators can leverage against companies, to do their bidding. Especially prevalent in fascist societies. Where companies could literally be filed for anything, anytime, but simply wouldn't be, if they "keep supporting their country", whatever that may mean. This is but just one reason as to why you cannot simply say "law is law" and think you made a decent argument. All that being said and with any implication made, probably being discarded with your next sip of scotch: I frankly cannot tell how good or bad your arguments are about Bitcoin and Blockchain technology. But I definitely can tell the obvious sophistry, lazy twisting, half truths and straw men, you rely on, when arguing against these ominous "anarchists", who you always talk about, as if they're haunting you. Am I an anarchist troll already? For taking to much time, answering, what I sadly have to describe as one (and by far not the only one) of the silliest twisted arguments Craig could come up with, in order to troll Roger (cringe)? Not once in any argument you made over the years did you present a fair coverage of the "anarchist" argument, regarding any given aspect. Not, who they are, not what they stand for, not even what they're actually saying. I am amazed at how you generally call yourself libertarian, given how bad you usually argue about it. You don't have to be a fringe "defacto-marxist" ancap, in order to rip your silly article or other of your takes apart (Saying anarchocapitalism is basically original marxism was the only reasonable argument, you ever made. And even that is an argument turning against you, when you take a detailed look at it) Anyway, I wonder, why you waste your time, when you're neither bringing anything new or at least decent enough to this discussion of the century, nor are interested to bear any grade of criticism or rebuttal, no matter how factual? Why even bother? You're not searching for honest debate here. This article hints the most at how you actually just cover up some personal dealings and struggles withing the cryptosphere with this senseless statist/anarchist debate. Which actually brings me to what I am saying, since that shitshow of hashwars we had: Having BCH and BSV line up in these bullshit ideological discussions shows the lack (and hence artificial fabrication) of actual, ultimate dividing reasons. It seems this false dichotomy has been facilitating fights and is molding both communities to a detriment, while being fired up by thoughtleaders, like you. It is far to conspiratorial for me to believe, this was all accounted for, but the circumstances combined surely creep me out.
And anyone arguing, that Roger had to be fined or jailed is either only partially informed or simply nobody, that someone with enough sense of morals and humanity left in him would need to listen to. At least not, when he tries to paint those "fringe anarchists" as immoral. Which is laughable. Good evening to you Craig. Great, that you're back from self-exile and back open for people, who not suck up to basic cool aid, like this. And please stop hating on Roger, for doing his own thing and stopping to trust you. Knowing your vices, I couldn't hold it against him or Jihan, for that matter.
No one has reviewed this piece of content yet