Ooops... BCH hijackers have no money | Goals of people in BTC vs BCH vs BSV | Kleiman case Theory
"You split, We bankrupt you", is a famous quote by Craig Wright, creator of Bitcoin which he said to Roger Ver as hash wars were about to start because BCH side wanted to change the protocol... now, already, just few months after the 2nd chain split (BCH/BSV), the BCH side of the fork are starting to feel the true reality and consequences of their actions
In this video I also explain what I have realised, is one massive difference in mentality between leading people in these 3x chains of Bitcoin... namely BTC, BCH & BSV and what their goal is in all this... what they want to get out.
BTC is lead/controlled/hijacked by people who are pro-existing establishment, they don't want a true Peer-to-Peer Digital Cash System for the whole world, instead, they want people NOT to use this system and instead use Lightning network, which is literally built by people who work for the bankers, and can only work as an almost identical replica to existing banking system, and therefore does not fix any of the issues we have today with existing monetary system.
BCH is lead/controlled/hijacked by people who want to remove the state completely and have lawless society... aka... Anarchy. These people pretend to be for the good of society, in reality they actually want to be the ones in power and controlling things, and profit from it, no different to what existing establishment is doing.
BSV is lead/protected/maintained by people who understand all the issues with existing monetary system (and few other issues we have in society due to misaligned incentives of the existing social media) and are willing to FIX THEM by adopting the original Bitcoin protocol.
Original Bitcoin protocol was created to provide TRANSPARENCY, OPENNESS, TRUTH AND FAIRNESS, natural laws which are balanced and is a system which is not meant to be controlled by anyone. which is the true meaning and way to achieve DECENTRALISATION, and both BTC and BCH side of the fork, have gone in completely different directions.
The economics of the Bitcoin system are also designed to force USAGE of the system, by USE & REPLACE mentality, and not HOLD mentality, as it is only USAGE and UTILITY that can enable this system to sustain itself into the future, which is exactly why Core/Blockstream, people who hijacked BTC, have changed it so that it cannot be used for anything, and have sold their blind and greedy followers, the narrative of it being "Store of Value" only.... which literally cannot exist in the real world, and trying to be just a "Store of Value" and nothing but SPECULATIVE "asset" BTC has turned into literal PONZI scheme.
And lastly, this is a theory which I think is highly likely:
"The Kleiman case is not about getting money - they probably have no proof to get it, otherwise they would have presented evidence in form of documents that showed that Kleiman owned x% of the bitcoins. The whole case is financed by Bitcoin Core, and the goal is that Craig reveals exactly what bitcoin addresses he owns - they just want this list. The moment they have this list, they will block these addresses with a softfork on the Segwit chain. Probably an idea from GMax - I think it was 3 years ago or so, when GMax said that Satoshis coins should be blocked forever."
Thank you for watching, I hope you have learned something new from this.
Video is also uploaded to Streamanity
No one has reviewed this piece of content yet